• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Estate Planning / Professionalism goes beyond instruction taking (Wills) Part 2

Professionalism goes beyond instruction taking (Wills) Part 2

2, September 2010 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

Last Updated on 10, April 2014

In a recent high court case of Soh Eng Beng (as executor and trustee of the Estate of Soh Kim Poo, deceased) v Soh Eng Koon was a case with regard to an ambiguous clause in a Will. The judge has to decide the exact meaning of the clause. But as I read the case, my opinion is that it could simply be a genuine human error which all humans are not immune. Anyway I will not dwell on the human error but the process in which the Will was written. According to the link above, I gather that the Will under dispute was written in the following circumstances:

  1. Although the cover page of the Will shows that the Will was written by a particular law firm, it turns out that the lawyer was not involved because of some personal family matters. The person who drafted the Will was the secretary (paragraph 19).
  2. The secretary took instructions, drafted the Will, make the necessary amendments and explained the contents of the Will in Hokkien to the testator.
  3. There was no attendance notes and hence no evidence of fact finding and analysis.
  4. The secretary made a spelling error in one of the beneficiary’s name and was responsible for one of the ambiguous clause under dispute.
  5. The testator may not have understood English and relied on the Hokkien translation. If this is the case, the testator must had fully relied on the Will Writer professionalism to do the right thing.

Although majority of Singaporeans have never written their Wills, those whom I had seen written their Wills previously wrote nonsensical Wills. Okay, the word “nonsensical” is too strong of a word but the problems of ambiguous clause is quite common. Sometime the Will’s content has no ambigiouity but it comes with many practical issues and potential unfair distribution. I mentioned previously in one of my blog post that I have to compensate for my client for a rubbish Will written by my recommended lawyer. I have since sack that lawyer. So new clients do not need to worry because I’ll not be referring them to that law firm.

In order for a Will to be properly written, the Judge state in paragraph 25 that "The preparation of a will involves serious professional responsibilities, which solicitors must uncompromisingly observe and discharge. Regrettably, it seems to us that, all too often nowadays, solicitors appear to consider the preparation of a will to be no more than a routine exercise in form filling. This is wrong. Before preparing a will, the solicitor concerned ought to have a thorough discussion with the testator on all the possible legal issues and potential complications that might arise in the implementation of the terms of the will. The solicitor ought to painstakingly and accurately document his discussions with and his instructions from the testator. He should also confirm with the testator, prior to the execution of the will, that the contents of the will as drafted accurately express the latter’s intention. A translation, if required, must be thoroughly and competently done. Half measures or the cutting of corners in the discharge of these serious professional responsibilities will not do."

In my opinion, such job requires thorough investigation (fact finding) into the testator’s background and a thorough analysis is also required so that the recommended Will can be properly drafted. But the question remains: How could a solicitor spent so much time doing this for a Will that cost only $200 or $300? I know of one law firm charges $120. There is no need to be a genius to guess why Will writing has been reduced to mere form filling. There is a saying – pay penults and you will get monkey.

To be fair, this problem of mere “form filling” is most widespread in the financial industry. In most financial advisory relationship the following is normally what happens (mirroring and following the above points):

  1. All documents will point out that the firm involved practices financial advisory and financial planning but in reality the firm hire salesmen to sell products. In other words, it is the salesman (unqualified) and NOT the true financial planner that meets the client. Sometimes, the entire firm does not even have a qualified financial planner.
  2. The salesman will meet the client, sell whatever products he is interested and explain the products – often omitting important negative details – to the client.
  3. There is little fact finding and analysis. But these days, firms are smart and have developed template fact finding and analysis forms which the salesman will fill up just to make MAS happy with the nice statistics. The nice statistics actually contradict itself because in a recent LIA statistics, despite majority of the insurance cases were conducted with some fact find, the average sum assured sold continues to be low indicating that these salesman are still doing the same old con-job of selling everything except to meet the needs of their clients.
  4. Although most people these days are English educated, they still have to rely on the professionals to help them fully because financial products have become incomprehensible to the man-in-the-street. That is why doctors, lawyers, accountants, teachers are all not immure to be cheated by financial salesmen.

But the question is this: Will clients be willing to pay to get good advice? In a recent question posed to me HERE, that person bought 4 regular premium insurance policies which I estimate to have paid together $6000 in commissions to the agent. Like most people, they think their advisor works for free but actually they are being paid huge commissions if they can convince the client to buy such products. But I know very few are willing to pay this same figure to get good advice. Therefore, the industry continues to reward product sellers and punish professionals who prefer to charge fees through consultation rather than product sales. That is why, many insurance agents and adviser continue to achieve the Million Dollar Round Table (MDRT).

Once in a while, I will have the honour to meet aspiring financial advisers who want to do the right thing to become a true professional rather than product sellers. I will tell them that my fee-based financial planning practice does not have a significant high volume. Every month I will get 1 to 3 cases of fee-based planning. For each case, I charge about $4000 - $5000. After these advisers do their sums and deduct expenditures and business cost, they figured that they cannot survive with such low volume of business and decided to continue their product selling. At least in product sellings, it is possible to earn $25,000 in commissions for each ILP easily. Becoming MDRT, TOT or COT isn’t a big problem to them.

Related article: Professionalism goes beyond instruction taking (Wills) Part 1

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Estate Planning, Insurance, Tragic Stories, Unethical sales process

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • Webinar on 7 Real Stories To Achieve Your Financial Freedom 6/6/2023
  • Webinar on Major change in cancer treatments in your integrated shield plans 3/9/2022
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Recent comments

  • Dipokdas on Travel Without Financial Worries: 3 Tips to Achieve Financial Independence (Sydney)
  • Nay Nay on Is PruSelect Vantage plan a good or bad product?
  • Basil on Question on Manulife InvestReady
  • mah weng kong on Is PruSelect Vantage plan a good or bad product?
  • Rafi on Wilfred Ling’s Story, the beginning
  • ECE7 on Wilfred Ling’s Story, the beginning

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2025 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty