• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Financial advisers / AXA demanding S$7 million back from Finexis, according to report

AXA demanding S$7 million back from Finexis, according to report

24, July 2010 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

In today’s Straits Times entitled “Insurer fumes over policy’s high lapse rate” dated 24 July 2010 by Ms Lorna Tan, it was reported that Finexis offered first year premium free for AXA’s FutureProtector – a term insurance. The first year is free because Finexis rebated majority of its commission to its clients. After 1 year, the policy lapse rate increased significantly to the extend that AXA is now demanding a clawback of commissions amounting to more than S$7 million from Finexis. Not only is AXA Life seeing red over the matter but more remarkably even Monetary Authority of Singapore has given a comment:

“They should not unduly influence the financial decisions of customers by offering rebates,” said an MAS spokesman.

To make things worse, the CEO of AXA Life resigned immediately due to ‘personal reasons’.

The center of the problem isn’t about the rebate per se but whether the recommendations were made on the reasonable basis and whether were there inducement.

The question is this: Why is rebating commission the same as inducement? And why is inducement wrong?

Why is rebating of commission the same as inducement?

In this Finexis-AXA Life fiasco, it is obvious that many clients purchased the AXA Life FutureProtector product because of the steep discount and just wanting the free coverage.  The reason for purchase is unlikely due to needs-based basis. In the financial industry, needs-based selling is the only legal method of selling a financial product. All other methods of selling financial products – including inducement – are illegal.

Why is inducement wrong?

Inducement is wrong because it always cause harm to at least one party.

Financial products are normally meant for long-term usage. AXA FutureProtector is a term insurance normally for 20 to 30 years of coverage. The premium and commission is priced to reflect the coverage period. If a person buys a 20 years term insurance but only to terminate it after just one year, than the insurer would make a lost. In this case, it made a significant lost due to overpaying  the commissions which unfortunately was used by Finexis to pay for the first year premiums.  For those who are not in the industry may like to know that commissions tend to be larger for longer coverage period. In this case, the rebates caused the insurer to suffer major losses.

For clients who decided to continue with the AXA FutureProtector are in no better position. According to the newspaper report, AXA FutureProtector is quite an expensive term insurance compared to its competitors. Hence, clients who would like to continue with the term insurance ends up with a raw deal.

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Financial advisers, Insurance, Unethical sales process

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 1 (Webinar) 10/7/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • Why are your prospects paying expensive investment courses instead of consulting you?   This video is for financial advisers. However...
  • List of all blog articles
  • AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 and my recommendations AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 was a product which someone recent...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2022 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty