• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Insurance / Unpublished Letter to the Straits Times forum on Life insurance industry selling few insurances

Unpublished Letter to the Straits Times forum on Life insurance industry selling few insurances

18, August 2010 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

I sent this letter to the Straits Times forum on 10 August 2010 but was rejected as they did not publish it. Perhaps it is just too boring. This is related to a blog article I wrote: LIA’s robust sales figure in life insurance unrelated to insurance.

Dear Editor,

I refer to the Straits Times article “Life insurers hit $2.6b in new sales” dated 6 August 2010. There are two abnormalities.

What the article did not mention was that the claims payout were $1.85 billion but only $210 million or 11% were due to death, disability or critical illness claims. The remaining 89% were unrelated to insurance claims although these products were manufactured by insurers.

In addition, despite 72% of sales done using partial or full-fact find, each regular premium policy being sold has an average sum assured of only $53,535. With such low coverage, how could any family last for more than a year? Perhaps financial advisers did the fact-find and analysis correctly but something very wrong happened in the recommendation stage.

The likely explanation for both abnormalities is that the life insurance industry has shifted its focus to non-insurance activities. Most of the products bought were meant for savings and investments rather than insurance.

It is no point trying to secure a good retirement through investments and savings when a family’s security for tomorrow cannot be assured. I appeal to all financial advisers to do the right thing in the way they conduct their recommendations by looking after the interest of their policyholders rather than their own interest. How would a widow feel when she receives such a pathetic amount from the insurance policy?

The soaring new sales and the fact that majority of the sales were done with some fact find are nothing to shout about.

Wilfred Ling

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Insurance, Letters to the Press, Unethical sales process

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 1 (Webinar) 10/7/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • CPF: How to Accumulate $1m in your CPF by 57? I read online that there are people who wants to achiev...
  • List of all blog articles
  • Vanguard funds in Singapore at just US$ 20,000! Vanguard is the world’s most famous index fund provider...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2022 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty