• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Financial advisers / Why Singapore & Australia opposed banning commissions?

Why Singapore & Australia opposed banning commissions?

28, April 2010 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

"Customers and clients, when they're seeing a financial planner, deserve to know that a financial planner is acting in their best interest and when you have commissions that is simply impossible," the Financial Services Minister Chris Bowen said in an article from channelnewsasia.com HERE. However, there is some opposition to it.

According to the article, "the conservative opposition said it would oppose the changes because they could prevent people on low incomes from accessing financial advice as they may not be able to pay for it up front." So it appears that the Australia opposition is going to make this an election issue. Australia is going to have a general election this year.

The Australia’s opposition party argument against banning commissions citing higher cost for low income to access financial advice sounds quite familiar In Singapore. The Monetary Authority of Singapore also acknowledge similar reasons in its "Second Part of Response to Feedback on Proposals to Strengthen the Regulation of the Sale and Marketing of Unlisted Investment Products" on page 3 which I quote from the PDF file:

“While we note the arguments in favour of a “fee-for-advice” remuneration structure, we are mindful of unintended consequences such as restricting consumers’ access to advice due to potentially higher costs of financial advisory services. We also acknowledge the concern regarding the viability of imposing a “fee-for–advice” remuneration structure in Singapore. We note that some jurisdictions have indicated intentions to ban commissions over the next few years.” - MAS

Both MAS and Australia’s opposition party appeared to share similar view that banning commissions will increase cost and restrict access to financial advice for certain segment of the population. Well, I am afraid I disagree with both parties. Both of them are wrong in one assumption which is the assumption that consumers (including the low income group) have access to financial advice in the first place. I personally do not think access to financial advice is that readily available even in the status quo. Many people do not realized that buying an insurance or buying some ILPs, dual currencies and structured notes are not financial advice. In fact, I hardly come across anyone who has truly obtained financial advice.

Recently, a survey commissioned by Russell Investments showed that less than 20% of Singaporeans have accessed professional financial advice when comes to retirement. You can read the brief article HERE. But my estimate is that it is actually much lower. Among the 20% who said that they have accessed to professional financial advice, it is likely 80% of them mistakenly believe the service they got from a product salesman is financial advice. Thus, this means probably only 4% of the 500 employed persons interviewed by Russell Investments actually obtain financial advice.

What is meant by professional financial advice? It is quite simply a service consisting of advice. It has nothing to do with products. I think the word “advice” is easy enough to understand that it is about one professional telling another layperson on what to do. If your financial adviser is fully remunerated by selling products, the focus will always be on product sales and not advice. If you did not pay for the advice, how can you be sure the adviser isn’t trying to sell a product?

Back to the Australia opposition party opposition to banning of commission and MAS’ similar views expressed previously. My view is that not only is the current population (including the low income group) not getting financial advice, but they are spending huge amount of money in inappropriate products and commissions. Sometime ago I met a cleaner. I mentioned to her that the most important insurance plan is hospitalization & surgical plan. She said she already bought some insurance from the bank. I discovered it was an endowment plan. I showed her the lowest Incomeshield Basic plan but she said she cannot afford it! Why? Because most of her money is committed to that endowment plan costing $100 per month and that commitment is over 10 years. As it can be seen that her financial well being is be jeopardized by the financial salesperson who sold her the endowment product without advising her appropriately.

I always encounter emails and meetings with financial advisers who are guilty stricken for harming their clients’ interest due to their high sales quota, agency and firm culture and as well as the pressure just to earn a living. To me, there are better ways to earn a living. Everyone has choices. There is no need to resort to ruining other people’s life just because one needs to earn a living or just because the boss say must cheat. Banning of commissions is a very blunt way of halting all these malpractices. But looking at the present situation, there appears to be no solution in sight to improve the professional standards of the financial industry. There is no association, professional bodies, etc who have the teeth and the professional skill to improve the industry. So I think halting commissions altogether will do the industry good. Since by my estimate only 4% of the population has access to financial advice, banning commissions altogether probably will not have a material impact to consumers’ choices since majority never accessed to financial advice. In fact, banning of commissions would probably help the remaining 96% to save lots of money by avoiding investing in inappropriate products.

Here is a related link: UK moving to Fee Paying Advice

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Financial advisers, Unethical sales process

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 1 (Webinar) 10/7/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • Why are your prospects paying expensive investment courses instead of consulting you?   This video is for financial advisers. However...
  • List of all blog articles
  • AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 and my recommendations AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 was a product which someone recent...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2022 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty