• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / CPF Matters / Regulation of CPF nominations not feasible

Regulation of CPF nominations not feasible

9, December 2014 by Wilfred Ling 2 Comments

regulation of cpf nomination not feasible

There was a case in which a man nominated his entire CPF to his ‘goddaughter’. Although his widowed wife tried hard to contest the nomination, she failed and incurred legal costs equivalent to the amount of CPF money the man had!

Someone wrote to the Straits Times suggesting that CPF Board regulate the distribution of CPF. I decided to write to the Straits Time forum:

doublequote-left-blackI AGREE with Mr Liew Kai Khiun that there is a need for greater regulatory intervention with regard to Central Provident Fund nominations ("Exercise more oversight of CPF nominations"; last Saturday), but there is always the risk of over-regulation.

Many people are already unhappy over limitations on how much CPF savings a person can withdraw at age 55. Regulating the manner in which one can bequeath one's CPF money would only increase the unhappiness.

Besides, a CPF member may have valid reasons for wanting to bequeath his savings to a person who is not related to him. For example, his family members may have already inherited a large portion of his estate through his will and insurance nominations, or as joint owners of properties.

Requiring the CPF Board to scrutinise the status and history of families and dependants would be an invasion of privacy, and the Board may find itself getting embroiled in family disputes.

Rules to restrict the distribution of CPF funds to just family members can also be easily circumvented, as the CPF member can use the money to purchase property or stocks, and then bequeath these to another person.

Instead, I suggest that a family member be required to provide written consent in order for the CPF member to nominate an unrelated person. This can be incorporated into the nomination form, and will save the CPF Board from having to look into members' private matters.

Wilfred Ling doublequote-right-black

Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/regulation-cpf-nominations-not-feasible-20141209

Update 11 December 2014: Agnes Sng felt that the individual should have the absolute right to select his own nominee:  CPF members should be free to pick nominees

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: CPF Matters, Estate Planning, Letters to the Press

Comments

  1. CK says

    10, December 2014 at 11:23 am

    I have been reading your articles for quite sometime and want to thank you for sharing your knowledge unselfishly. However, regarding the point you mentioned in this article :-
    ” Instead, I suggest that a family member be required to provide written consent in order for the CPF member to nominate an unrelated person. This can be incorporated into the nomination form, and will save the CPF Board from having to look into members’ private matters.”

    I think we are already been regulated and limit on how we can use our OWN CPF money, to further enhance this restriction by havng a written consent by family members before nomination is a added burden to members CAUSED if 1 or 2 disagree, the money can not be dominated to the person deem deserving by the CPF member.

    On this particular incident, no one except the family members knows (or may be they also dont know) what happens that leads to the decease acted this way. For a husband and father to disregard his spouse, family members interests and instead transfer all financial means to a third party who says she dont know the decease well (but money going to her) is really ???????

    But to enforce a law to require family member consent in domination is rather in Chinese saying “use cow knife slash chicken”. (moreover, domination is supposed to be secret) Instead I would prefer like what you menioned in your earlier article also that they, the family member or wife can appeal to court under the ground of spouse or children financial needs responsibilty required by the decease to stop the assets flowing out just like that.

    Imagine a person lying in REN-CHI hospital for 10yrs and hardly anyone came to visit him and he decided to dominate his CPF to the care person or persons who shower, cleans, feeds, walk, talks and take care of him with love, patient and sincereity all this while when he dies. Whos to say he is wrong? and who in the family will consent it?

    Reply
    • Wilfred Ling says

      11, December 2014 at 10:18 am

      Agree there could be legitimate reason why a person would want to give all his assets away to unrelated person.

      But who is going to judge what is legitimate and what is not legitimate ? Currently it is the Court which decides. Legal fees to seek justice to the courts is astronomical. The layperson just cannot afford it. Look at this widow who already spent $37,000 in legal fees (equivalent to exact amount of the CPF money). She still lost her case. In other words, her losses doubled as a result of trying to seek justice from the courts. End of the day, only lawyers are the winners.

      In majority of other countries which practice Civil Law, they practice forced-heirship in which certain percentage of a deceased estate is distributed to family members.

      Reply

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 1 (Webinar) 10/7/2021
  • iFAST Monthly Investment Update -July 2020 7/7/2020

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • Premium financing – why banks always sell the same thing? Premium financing, equity linked notes, dual currencies...
  • How You Can Buy & Hold Stock Investment Using Simple Criterions! There are two ways to invest in stocks. One is long ter...
  • Is the PRUlink protection plus account a good or bad product? Question: “Hi Wilfred, due to family history, I am look...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2022 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty