• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Credit Management / The Real Singapore: Evidence on little understanding on financial planning from stolen article

The Real Singapore: Evidence on little understanding on financial planning from stolen article

27, October 2014 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

Last Updated on 9, February 2016

0 zero

The original title of this blog was "zero understanding on financial planning". Hence the above zero picture. But I decided to change the title to "little understanding on financial planning".

Recently one of my old article entitled Man lost almost his entire HDB property to siblings due to poor financial planning got “stolen” and was published without my permission on The Real Singapore website and shared on their facebook page. I was going to write to the editor of The Real Singapore for copyright infringement when I got shocked with the reaction of the commentators. The reaction was so comical that I decided to also share to all by copying and pasting the facebook comments:

Daniel Ah Goh: Its not poor financial planning! This bloody bastard, Mr Cheong wanted 2 own 2 HDBs by using his mum! The court done the right thing!!

and

Eugene Lim The story express nothing about poor financial planning. What I can understand is that the man own greed backfire him when his siblings betray him. Reading the article clearly explain that the man wanted to own 2 HDB for obvious reason of profiting when the price when up. If he has the whole intention of taking care of his mother, his should have his mother living with him and not dumping her with another sibling. His intention to utilize his mother name to assist him owning 2 HDB flat is profiteering HDB through the expenses of other needy Singaporean who has been eagerly waiting for their own home. His action also contribute to the rising price of HDB flats by allowing him to profiteer 2 HDB. He calls the action of his sibling betrayal, I call them justice. In another words, his scam (to the public) backfire.  The author seems to have extremely poor understanding of exploiting the system and poor financial planning. I thanks to the heaven I have not meant to meet such financial adviser who claim to have so much experiences cannot tell a different between a scam and a financial plan. That makes me think his products would prolly be a scam since he can't tell the different.

Fact: The judge actually took pity on Mr. Cheong and did not accused him of being greedy.

 

Wesley Yeo: Misleading title by the author, after all it's not about financial aspect, it's not about the money. It's about family dispute and property ownership.

Fact: Property is a financial asset. Family disputes, financial planning, property ownership and money matters are not mutually exclusive but in fact are closely interrelated.

 

Ken Lau: just a few para i quit reading...its family dispute all because of money involved..not poor financial management. Dont con people to buy more and more and more of the policies....  Ken Yap: I agree. It's got nothing to do with financial planning whatsoever. And a will is not a secure instrument either. He should have brought his mother to CPF to nominate him as her sole beneficiary to ensure the property goes to him without any hitches. And it's FREE!! No legal fees!

Fact: The above two posts were the most comical among all the comments. Financial planning is meant to avoid family disputes and financial losses. CPF Nomination cannot be used to bequeath property. Comparing Will and CPF Nomination is like comparing applies and oranges.  They are two mutually exclusive legal instruments.

 

Ricky Loo: It is not about financial planning but rules that prohibit and confuse people. It is the G policies in HDB and CPF that kill Singaporeans or crippled them to poverty.

Fact: Government policies and laws are not designed to be anti-Singaporeans. But ignorance of existing laws and regulations can indeed caused families into poverty just as ignorance of traffic laws can led to accidents and deaths.

 

Haziq Evan Rose: That has absolutely nothing to do with financial planning, poor or otherwise.

Fact: Estate planning is part of financial planning.

 

Freddie Kee: The most important thing is to have a will ie the mother should have a will.Never die without a will or the HDB become the trustee. Jophrey Lim: HDB will not become the trustee. The HDB flat asset goes to Public Trustee, which will administer the asset and distribute according to Singapore law.

Fact: Housing and Development Board does not become the Trustee of the property if the deceased sole owner does not have a will. Given that the Public Trustee cannot accept estate size above $50,000, Jophrey Lim's statement is incorrect since HDB flats are worth more than $50,000 these days. For clarity, the Public Trustee cannot act in the following situation:

  • Where the estate exceeds $50,000 in value.
  • Where a Court application for Letter of Administration or Grant of Probate has been taken out.
  • Where there are conflicting claims to the estate or disputes among the beneficiaries.
  • Where the estate has outstanding debts or liabilities.
  • Where the Deceased had shares or other interest in unlisted companies (foreign or local).
  • Where the Deceased was a partner, a sole-proprietor or had interest in a firm or other business.
  • Where the Deceased was the sole lessee (owner) of a HDB flat and there are minor interests.
  • Where there are pending lawsuits which involve the Deceased.
  • Where there are insurance policies under Section 73 of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap. 61)
  • Where there are trust bank account(s) opened with a minor
  • Where there are commercial vehicles involved like taxis

 

Jophrey Lim:  The author isn't that knowledgeable after all. When a 3 years old inherit inheritance from his/her parents, all assets will go to public trustee and will be held by public trustee till the child attain 18/21 years old. The child's guardian can apply to the public trustee to get maintenance money & other expenses related to the child. The guardian can't do anything he/she wants. That is why it is advisable to nominate your spouse to 100% of your assets rather than 50% to your spouse and 50% to your children. If you do that, 50% of the assets will be held by public trustee and your spouse will be the guardian that need to seek public trustee approval for the usage of the 50% assets. And in the case of CPF monies, nominate 1% to each of your children and the rest to your spouse. Why? This is just in case and you and your spouse died at the same time, eg. car accident or plane crash. In this case, the CPF will distribute the money to the children automatically (by sending the monies to public trustee) instead of take long time to investigate the rightful person and charge a hefty fee for the investigation.

Fact: It seems the above commentator is confused between estate distribution of CPF monies and non-CPF monies and as well as the involvement of the Public Trustee. Her last paragraph is correct to some extend. The part on CPF charging money to investigate is the first I have heard though.

The facebook link can be found HERE.

What is really financial planning?

The comments are evidence of the lack of understanding of financial planning. Some of the comments provide us with some insight as to certain misconception about financial planning such as:

  1. The misconception that financial planning and property ownership are unrelated. In fact, the largest financial assets are often properties.
  2. The misconception that financial planning and disputes are unrelated. In fact, the purpose of financial planning is to avoid problems, disputes and financial losses. If there is not going to be a problem, why do financial planning?
  3. There is also significant demonstration of lack of understanding in Singapore laws and rules related to financial planning. But to be ignorant is not a sin after all everybody is born ignorant. What is troubling is that people do not realised that they are ignorant of the laws and try  to act smart by advising others with misinformation. When things go wrong, people blame everybody else except themselves.
  4. The misconception that estate planning is not part of financial planning.
  5. The misconception that financial planning means buying insurance or it is disguise to sell insurance policies.

Financial planning actually covers all of the following:

  1. Budgeting (cash flow) and net worth.
  2. Risk management (insurance)
  3. Credit management (normally related to mortgage loans)
  4. Children’s education
  5. Retirement Planning
  6. Investment Planning
  7. Tax Planning and
  8. Estate Planning (wills/trusts/nominations).

MoneySense, a national financial education programme for Singapore and supported by Monetary Authority of Singapore defined financial planning as (they missed out on the credit management):

  1. Managing your cashflow for your needs today and also to meet future goals like your retirement or your children’s education;
  2. Managing you and your family’s exposure to unforeseen events like pre-mature death, illness or disability;
  3. Investment planning to meet your financial goals;
  4. Planning for your retirement;
  5. Planning your taxes efficiently; and
  6. Planning the transfer of your estate to the people and causes you care about.

Financial Planning and consumer education are strongly discouraged by proposed new legislation

Ironically, financial planning is going to be defined as a non-Financial Advisory (non-FA) activity. Under the near final draft of the legislation, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) will not permit Licensed Financial Advisory companies to derive more than 5% of its revenue from financial planning. In other words, it seems MAS wants these companies to sell insurance and investments (although risk management/ insurance and investments supposed to be part of financial planning).

Don’t believe me? Go to the draft consultation paper by clicking on this website here: Consultation paper October 2014. Go to page 14. Paragraph 15 and 16 are saying that the licensed financial advisory firm’s revenue must not exceed 5% deriving from:

  1. Providing training and consultancy in respect of financial planning or financial literacy aimed at educating and empowering consumers;
  2. Providing will writing, estate planning and tax planning services.

For lawyers, you can read the draft legislation here:

  1. Click: SECOND DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE FINANCIAL ADVISERS REGULATIONS
  2. Search for “Part VIA Prescribed Non-Financial Advisory Activities”
  3. Section 38B(1)(a)(b) and (b) stated the financial planning, will writing and tax planning are declared permitted ‘non-FA’ activities.
  4. Section 38B(3) says these non-FA activities cannot exceed 5% of annual revenue.

My impression in MAS capping revenue to a tiny amount implies that it is a bad thing to provide consultancy on financial planning. Worst, does it implies that MAS is discouraging FA companies from educating and empowering consumer? Or put it another way round, does it mean it is a good thing to see consumers to continue to be ignorant and get cheated?

Did I miss out anything? Or am I becoming cynical?

Conclusions

  1. There is a lot of misinformation on what constitute financial planning.
  2. Ignorance can be overcome through education. But it is very dangerous when those who are ignorant does not know of their ignorance and try to act smart by spreading misinformation to those who are already ignorant.
  3. New regulation discourages professional financial advisers from providing training and consultancy on financial planing.
  4. New regulation discourages financial advisers from educating consumers to become financial literate.
  5. New regulation discourages financial advisers from empowering their customers.

Because of (1) to (5), consumers will always be ignorant.

Update 3 May 2015: MDA orders The Real Singapore admins to disable access to online properties

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Credit Management, Estate Planning, Insurance, Investments, Networth, Retirement Planning, Tax Planning, Tragic Stories

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • Webinar on Major change in cancer treatments in your integrated shield plans 3/9/2022
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 and my recommendations AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 was a product which someone recent...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • Should You Buy Insurance From Friends? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbXP_sUiF8M Question: S...
  • CPF: How to Accumulate $1m in your CPF by 57? I read online that there are people who wants to achiev...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on What Can You Invest If You Have $400k?
  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2023 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty