• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Insurance / ST forum: Why integrated shield plans are not competitive?

ST forum: Why integrated shield plans are not competitive?

22, July 2014 by Wilfred Ling 2 Comments

Recently, a number of Members of Parliament wanted the government to regulate the Integrated shield plans to prevent profiteering. I feel that regulation to prevent profiteering should not be encouraged in the free market system like Singapore as it gives the impression that the pursue of excellence in making good profit is bad. Whether profit is good or bad depends on whose perspective.

A shareholder of a company will view it as good while a consumer would view it as bad. Is the shareholder a lesser person compared to a consumer? Often, the consumer is also a shareholder of a profit-oriented company. Moreover, if profit-oriented companies provide jobs and give good bonuses to its employees, who is to say that it is profiteering?

The word ‘profiteering’ gives the impression that earning outrageous profit is wrong. But the issue is  who is to say exceeding (example) 30% of profit margin is bad? Why is 29% good but 30% bad? Where do we draw the line?

Dr Amy Khor , the Senior Minister of State for Health, said that although 60% of Singaporeans have Integrated shield plans, not many people know that their integrated shield plans include Medishield. Hence, the government will put a ‘human face to the message’ to help integrated shield plans policyholders understand how their plans work with MediShield Life. This means the need for the government to harness huge resources to deliver ‘this message’.

As I do not entirely agree to regulate how much an insurer earns and at the same time felt that the government can better channel its resources to elsewhere, I decided to write to the Straits Times. The following was published on 22 July 2014 Straits Times forum page:


SOME MPs have suggested that Integrated Shield Plans (IPs) be regulated to prevent profiteering ("MPs suggest regulation for Integrated Shield plans"; July 10).integrated shield plans

I suggest that the regulators look into why the market for IPs is not competitive in the first place, giving rise to the perception of profiteering.

If there were free competition among the five insurers offering IPs, such plans would be priced fairly.

But this is not the case at the present moment.

One reason is that four out of five financial advisers in Singapore are "tied-agents" who can sell IPs from only one insurer; independent financial advisers are in the minority.

Very often, the consumer is unable to make an informed decision when purchasing an IP, as no comparisons are made with other IPs.

Would it not be better if the Government mandated that all financial advisers carry IPs from the five insurers?

To prevent any conflict of interest, commissions could be standardised across these IPs.

The influence of financial advisers cannot be underestimated. They are responsible for the huge number of IPs sold to two out of every three people in Singapore.

This brings me to the next point that financial advisers have always been the "human face" in educating their clients on financial matters ("Putting a 'human face to the message' "; July 10).

They are well positioned to explain to clients how IPs and MediShield Life work - which many Singaporeans do not understand - beyond just the nuts and bolts.

A major reason why Singaporeans have such poor financial literacy is the poor training provided for financial advisers.

Very often, the training they are given involves sales and marketing. Any technical training is for their own products, with little emphasis on government policies.

Since educating clients is part and parcel of the insurance sales process, I suggest that the Government conduct technical courses for financial advisers, especially on topics related to government schemes, as part of their continuing professional training.

Government agencies providing training to private-sector professionals is not new. For instance, the HDB regularly conducts continuing professional development courses for real estate agents.

Wilfred Ling


Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/why-integrated-plans-are-not-competitive-20140722


Update 13 January 2016

The government did not reply to this forum letter. However, MAS/MOH implemented my suggested training for financial advisers. With effect from 1 January 2016, all financial advisers must undergo compulsory 2 hours training for Medishield Life every year! Opps..

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Insurance, Letters to the Press

Comments

  1. xyz says

    23, July 2014 at 5:03 pm

    Poor financial literacy due to poorly trained financial advisers is not really true. From my experience, almost half of financial advisers (at least those with fulltime Uni education) knows about the various govt policies and how they work. Problem is that they rather use sales tactics and emotional twisting to close quick sales. The problem is due to attitude & character. Not due to knowledge or training.

    Reply
    • Wilfred Ling says

      23, July 2014 at 5:20 pm

      Do you want to write in to forum to counter this letter? It will do good to let your opinion be heard in Straits Times.

      Reply

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 1 (Webinar) 10/7/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • CPF: How to Accumulate $1m in your CPF by 57? I read online that there are people who wants to achiev...
  • AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 and my recommendations AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 was a product which someone recent...
  • Vanguard funds in Singapore at just US$ 20,000! Vanguard is the world’s most famous index fund provider...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2022 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty