• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Wilfred Ling from Client to Adviser
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Financial advisers / Why financial advisers must abandon their clients?

Why financial advisers must abandon their clients?

27, September 2009 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

I often hear of complains from clients that their previous advisers stop contacting them after a few years. Clients often felt that their advisers were just out to make money but did not bother about after sales service. I would like to write about this from a new perspective.

Let’s say the adviser need to earn $4000 per month in earnings. Assuming a banding rate of 70%, the gross revenue to earn is 4000/0.70 = $5714. I want to provide some illustration for advisers that employ three different types of business models:

Model 1 – Earnings based on Transaction

Assuming each sale can provide $750 in gross commission (this figure is purely for illustration purpose only), he needs to close nearly 8 cases / clients per month. For simplicity we assume this $750 is the present value of current and future recurrent commissions.

Therefore in one year he would have accumulated 8*12 = 96 clients. In three years, there would be accumulatively 288 clients. In five years, it would be 480. In ten years it will be 960 clients.

But there are only 252 working days in a year. It is impossible to provide any “after-sales” service for more than 252. So some older clients have to be drop out especially those who do not generate any more new sales.

Those that will not be drop out will have to buy new products or permit their unit trusts to be churned (frequent switching of funds at high cost without good reason which is a criminal offence but many advisers still do it).

As you can see, this model does not provide for the adviser to support existing clients because earnings are always based on new sales.

The great majority of the adviser including insurance agents, IFAs and banks employ this model. Large financial institutions tend to use this model because of the culture of focusing on short-term profit rather than long-term. Most banks’ frontline staff are salaried with some amount in performance bonus. However, if they cannot meet their sales targets, they will be fired. So they end up chasing short-term transactions and get into these same problems as everybody else in the industry.

Model 2 – Earnings based on Asset Under Management (AUM)

In this model, the adviser gets his clients to invest with him. He earns via a management fee. Using the same $5714 in gross revenue required, he need to earn 5714*12=$68,568 per year in gross revenue. To do this, he needs to have an AUM of at least $6,856,800 assuming a management fee of 1% per annum.

Let’s say he wants to provide 4 days of meeting with each existing clients in a year, it means that at very most he could have (252 – 21)/4 = 57 clients. I assume this fellow take 21 days of leave per year.

Therefore, the asset that each client need to invest is an average of 6856800/57=$120,294

This model is much better because there is a provision on how he is going to support his existing clients. Implied in this model there will be no more additional new clients once he reaches his maximum number.

The disadvantage is that each client must invest at least $120,294. In other words, everyone must put a six figure sum with this adviser regardless whether is this suitable, needed or appropriate. If the client is ultra conservative and only dare to put money in fixed deposit, the adviser will have to force the client to invest anyway and this will be detrimental to the client. This is of course a criminal offence but some advisers do it anyway.

Model 3 – Agreed Annual Fee

In this model, each client agrees to remunerate the adviser based on a predefined yearly fee.

Again using the same gross revenue of $5714 and assuming that annual fee agreed is $2000 per client per year. This means that he need to have at least 5714*12/2000 = 34 clients.

This figure means that he can afford to meet each client on an average of (252-21)/34= 6.7 times a year.

This model is also quite good because there is a provision on how he is going to support his existing clients. Moreover, clients do not need to invest even a single cent. The adviser is free to advice on a wide ranging of financial matters such as tax, estate planning, investment bought from another adviser and insurance. Even sourcing for the best fixed deposit rates can be part of the on-going service!

The setback in this model is that unless the agreed annual fee is adjusted for inflation; the adviser will still need to acquire new clients just to maintain his earnings at the same level on a long-term basis.

In Singapore, most advisers employ Model 1. Some uses a combination of Model 1 and Model 2.

I know of nobody except the author of this blog who uses Model 3.

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Featured, Financial advisers, Unethical sales process

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • iFAST Monthly Investment Update -July 2020 7/7/2020
  • Navigator Newsletter_June 2020 (36 pages) 19/6/2020
  • iFAST Monthly Investment Update -June 2020 (21 pages) 9/6/2020
  • Fortitude Budget – Save, create jobs and be post-pandemic ready 28/5/2020
  • Navigator Newsletter May 2020 (44 pages) 22/5/2020

View All

For Clients Only

  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q1 2020 5/2/2020
  • PPAM Quarterly Market Outlook 1Q2020 (17 pages) 1/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • CPF: How to Accumulate $1m in your CPF by 57? I read from the CPF’s AREYOUREADY facebook about a man...
  • Vanguard funds in Singapore at just US$ 20,000! Vanguard is the world’s most famous index fund provider...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • How financial advisers are paid? This article is inspired by this article YOUR PRACTICE-...

Recent comments

  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies
  • Josephine Pek on Nomination in insurance policies
  • chonghoong lim on Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning
  • Jeremy Tan on Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning
  • Janice on CPF Retirement Sum Scheme
  • Duskerdawn on Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA
5 years milestone in Continuing Education

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy
© Copyright 2006-2021 Wilfred Ling. All Rights Reserved hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty