• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Investments / Difference between customers, bondholders & shareholders

Difference between customers, bondholders & shareholders

4, May 2009 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

bonds currency

Yesterday, Prudential Asset Management came to our office to provide a talk on market outlook and to promote their funds.

The speaker said that the valuation for bonds are very low. This is because the current default rate is 20% but the bond prices are reflecting a default rate of more than 50%. In the Great Depression time, the bond default rate was 47%. So based on this reason, bonds are very cheap. Besides, with all the stimulus package by the various government, the economy will recover.

I argued with her that her reasoning is flawed on two counts:

First, the bond prices currently are likely to be fair to reflect a default rate of more than 50%. Statistically the default rate currently is 20% but this is just statistic. There are situation which bonds have defaulted but not counted as a default. The classic examples are General Motors and Chryler. Debtholders are now forced to convert their bonds to equity. By doing this, there will be no record of bond defaulting afterall bondsholders give their “consent” to convert their holdings to equity. With the huge share dilution, these shares turned worthless. In addition, debt holders have a higher priority to the assets of the bond issuer but equity holders will only be entitled to the residual. Thus if the company enters into bankruptcy, the capital that debt holders can recover will be very significant. Equity holders on the other hand gets nothing if all assets have already been distributed to debt holders and creditors. Many debt holders are investment trusts with a certain investment mandate. If the mandate prohibits the holdings of shares or the possession of converted shares violates their asset allocation policy, they will than have to force sell their converted shares at a very distress price. To me, that’s equivalent of bond defaulting anyway.

Second, an economy recovery does not mean it translate to investment recovery. As it can be seen from the above example of GM and Chryler, debt holders and shareholders would probably lose all their capital if both companies go through the planned restructuring. However, the jobs that both companies can provide on the mid to long-term will help the economy to recover.

Many of my clients invest in “too-big-to-fail” companies. These are either in bonds or equity stake. It is incorrect to say that investment in such companies is very safe. It is true that some companies are so big that the government will not allow it to fail. However, sharesholders are almost always never the one which governments would protect. The simply reason is that when an investor invests in a company, he already knew that as an equity stake holder, his entitlement is the residual profit of the company. If there is no profit, he gets nothing. If the company is insolvent, he gets nothing. On the other hand, when the company performs well, he gets everything after obligations to debt and creditors are met. This means during the good times, the equity holders’ entitlement has no upper limit.

From the financial crisis, we can now have a clearer understanding of risk-return characteristics. Government bodies will tend to assist the following groups of stake holders from the highest priority to the lowest priority:

  1. Customers and the greater good of the economy
  2. Bondholders
  3. Shareholders

We can see how AIG was not permitted to fail because it has too many big customers which if they fail will cause severe damage to the economy. Thus, AIG’s customers (mainly the swap counterparties) have to be protected at all cost. In return for the bailout, US government becomes a 70% shareholder. As a result of massive share dilution, AIG share price plunged to become almost worthless. In this case, shareholders were never part of the government’s rescue package.

For GM and Chryler, both bondholders and shareholders were never part of the rescue package. They have to sacrifice almost all their capital for the greater good of the economy. You see, the auto industry is an oligopoly market. There are only very few auto markers. A collapse of two auto giants could cause the entire auto industry to be dominated by the next giant player and this could result in a monopoly. Generally, a monopoly is not desirable to the industry due to the lack of competition.

Conclusions:

  1. Investing in blue-chip companies or companies that are too big to fail does not mean anything because shareholders will always be the first in line to sacrifice for everybody else.
  2. Large companies can fail.
  3. Diversify the portfolio and admit ignorance. It is arrogant to put an oversized amount of money into just a few companies. The market does not give special privilege to those who are arrogant.

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Investments

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 1 (Webinar) 10/7/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • CPF: How to Accumulate $1m in your CPF by 57? I read online that there are people who wants to achiev...
  • List of all blog articles
  • Vanguard funds in Singapore at just US$ 20,000! Vanguard is the world’s most famous index fund provider...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2022 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty