• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Wilfred Ling from Client to Adviser
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Investments / Case study of a typical 2nd generation high networth portfolio

Case study of a typical 2nd generation high networth portfolio

7, May 2016 by Wilfred Ling 2 Comments

Sometime ago I met an individual who wanted to consult me on his investment portfolio. One of the bond that he bought from a bank had defaulted. He was concerned that more bonds in his portfolio will default.

The bond that defaulted consist of only a negligible portion of his portfolio (approximately less than 1.5%). Mathematically there is no cause of concern. But upon more fact finding, I found him to be extremely conservative. If we live in an ideal world, fixed deposit is the only suitable product.  Unfortunately, we live in a fallen world. That is where I was called upon to review the entire portfolio.

After the initial preliminary meeting, the prospect agreed to engage me and the fees were also agreed upon.

I immediately started work on it by first analyzing the existing portfolio.

When I was about to finish the work, I received a message from the client to halt all work. Apparently he had second thought and decided to engage another financial adviser whom he thought was more competent. The financial adviser was also someone he knew. The client did not think I was good enough because I needed about 15 hours for the entire financial planning process. But based on highlight, I guess the client was unwilling to pay for my fees because my fee is based on hourly rate. I guess someone quoted him a lower fee or perhaps entirely free of charge.

I did not even have the chance to present my findings. I was totally cut off like this. I also forgot to ask for a deposit before starting work. It is my custom to ask for a deposit but for this case, I totally forgot about it. Effectively, my client defaulted on paying me my consultation fee.

I was so furious over this. But after having thought about it, I should have realized that this was coming. There were signs that this case was going to waste my time. The following were warning signs:

  1. The prospect was financially illiterate. This was evidenced by the fact that a loss of mere 1.5% of the portfolio triggered so much concern.
  2. The prospect gave a majority of the portfolio to be discretionary managed by the relationship manager. When an investor gives discretionary control to relationship manager, it implies the investor is totally clueless as to what was happening. It is like giving the keys of one’s house to a thief.
  3. The prospect was a 2nd generation high networth. 2nd generation high networth are those whose wealth were mainly from inheritance or gifts or a windfall. As long as the wealth of a person comes from sources except by his own effort, I consider such a person as 2nd generation high networth. As I mentioned previously in my blog, 2nd generation high networth has no asset allocation skill and they are my worst clients.

Since I wasn’t paid for my fee, I will publish the results of my findings.

Based on my assessment, the client had a conservative risk profile. The only suitable investment products are short duration investment grade bonds and annuities. Investment properties may not be suitable due to the high liquidity risk.

The following was the existing portfolio’s asset allocation:

high networth portfolio

Nearly 85% of the portfolio was invested in high risk investments. A very large portion was in junk bonds. As for the investment grade bonds, those were of long duration bonds. Hence, 100% of the entire portfolio was deemed unsuitable by me to be beyond his risk profile.

Not shown above was also a Universal Life with premium financing. When I asked him the reason for buying a Universal Life, he could not answer except to say it was recommended by a friend. When I asked him whether did anyone ever explain how Universal Life can be used, he said nobody explained to him.

As it can be seen that this is a typical rubbish type of asset allocation that a 2nd generation has. Regardless of risk profile, it is always the same rubbish.

I did not complete my recommendations since I was unceremoniously ordered to stop work but I was already thinking of short duration Singapore Government Securities (SGS). I did start to research on the true liquidity of the SGS as I feared that the huge portfolio size will end up moving the SGS yield curve! I did toy with the idea of helping him apply for SGS new issue using Internet Banking but I was not sure whether this was permitted since the transaction amount was going to be very large. When I was asking around for SGS’s true liquidity, my industry peers laughed and mocked at me because the primary market for SGS does not pay commission at all. The only way to get a reasonable yield from SGS is from new issue – which means I cannot charge a sales charge. But I do not need to charge a sales charge since I am paid based on hourly rate.

Unfortunately, the client thought that I would take too long to work on the case and probably did not wish to pay for my fee. It is likely the ‘free adviser’ that he was going to engage will recommend another new set of rubbish portfolio and laughed all the way to the bank. Imagine if the free adviser gets 1% in commission for a SGD 100m portfolio, that is equivalent to a whopping $1 milllion in commission! As for Wilfred Ling, his fee was supposed to be a pathetic $3750 and at the end of the day did not even get a single cent!

The last time someone refused to pay me my consultation fee was also a high networth individual.

Frankly speaking, I am no longer keen to review rubbish portfolio.

rubbish

 

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Case studies, Investments Tagged With: hnw

Comments

  1. temperament says

    8, May 2016 at 7:16 am

    No lah,
    May i give my point of view.

    Just make sure upfront take a deposit from him.
    Business is business
    This is an example of the irony of life.
    The more he needs your professional advice the less he thinks he needs you.
    And that’s because you are a professional and not a friend.
    The irony of life again, just because the Bank RM treated him like a long lost friend, he trusted him more lol.
    My 2 cents.

    Reply
  2. xyz says

    8, May 2016 at 4:50 pm

    QE and ZIRP and NIRP has created a huge lucrative environment for shitty companies all over the world to issue junk bonds. And banks are all too happy to accept big fees to structure these bonds, and market them to clueless HNWs and also to package such bonds to be sold to fund managers & retail masses. These are basically equivalent to the subprime housing loans in 2003-2007, except now they are occurring all over the world, and not just in the US.

    Wilfred, I think you got a bit too emo (i.e. greedy) and blinded when you saw the size of the portfolio, and compounded when you thought the guy was a helpless newbie who was going to sit quietly and wait for you.

    Reply

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • iFAST Monthly Investment Update -July 2020 7/7/2020
  • Navigator Newsletter_June 2020 (36 pages) 19/6/2020
  • iFAST Monthly Investment Update -June 2020 (21 pages) 9/6/2020
  • Fortitude Budget – Save, create jobs and be post-pandemic ready 28/5/2020
  • Navigator Newsletter May 2020 (44 pages) 22/5/2020

View All

For Clients Only

  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q1 2020 5/2/2020
  • PPAM Quarterly Market Outlook 1Q2020 (17 pages) 1/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • CPF: How to Accumulate $1m in your CPF by 57? I read from the CPF’s AREYOUREADY facebook about a man...
  • Vanguard funds in Singapore at just US$ 20,000! Vanguard is the world’s most famous index fund provider...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • How financial advisers are paid? This article is inspired by this article YOUR PRACTICE-...

Recent comments

  • LittleTiger on Nomination in insurance policies
  • Josephine Pek on Nomination in insurance policies
  • chonghoong lim on Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning
  • Jeremy Tan on Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning
  • Janice on CPF Retirement Sum Scheme
  • Duskerdawn on Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA
5 years milestone in Continuing Education

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy
© Copyright 2006-2021 Wilfred Ling. All Rights Reserved hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty