• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Case studies / Case study on simple integration of retirement & special needs planning

Case study on simple integration of retirement & special needs planning

22, March 2015 by Wilfred Ling 7 Comments

Last Updated on 28, October 2016

A client of mine has a daughter who suffers from Down syndrome. He wants to do some special needs planning for her but is not prepared to go through a thorough estate planning service because he has yet to decide on how to deal with many of his assets.

Hence, he and his wife do not wish to write their wills (yet).

They are also not prepared to go through a very detailed planning with me because they do not have time to fill up the long spreadsheet I gave them. However, they provided me with bulk park figures.

I suggested modular planning. This article is on how I do modular planning. All the figures and many of the facts were changed in this article but the main gist remains unchanged.

The following were partial fact finding (based on my written notes):

  • Both client and his wife are turning 55 this year. Both of them are still working.
  • CPF Life (combined): $2500 (estimated) at age 65. CPF-SA is expected to be zero out soon due to the transfer to CPF-RA.
  • Properties: A few.  I estimated they were worth about $4,000,000.
  • Monthly rental income: $10,000.
  • Cash in the bank: $1,700,000
  • Mortgage loan: $500,000
  • Children: 2 sons and 1 daughter who has special needs. His two sons are expected to graduate soon.

No detailed breakdown of the family expenses were provided to me (frankly speaking the client does not really know!) but I estimated it is about $15,000 a month.

They had bad experience with stocks, unit trusts and ILPs. Hence, their only investments are in properties.

They told me that they have attended various talks on estate planning for special needs children. They also attended my talk before on the same topic. What is stopping them was that they do not wish to set aside so much money when they are still alive because they need the money for their own retirement and they want to retain some flexibility on how to decide on what to do with their money in the future.

I advised them that they cannot have the cake and eat it all. Still, they can retain some flexibility if they set aside the money for their special needs child.

Later on I found that they already setup a trust with Special Needs Trust Company except that they only put in a few thousand dollars into the trust and there was no other funding mechanism. In other words, the trust is unfunded and will be unfunded if they don’t do something.

Looking at their situation, I suggest the two parents consider to purchase two single premium anticipated whole life policy insuring their own lives and making a nomination under the Insurance Act s49M to the trust which was already setup.

The following is what the whole life policy looks like:

  • Single premium $500,000
  • Death benefit is always 101% of the single premium plus a non-guaranteed amount.
  • There is a monthly payout projected at 4.5%/12 of the single premium starting after 5 years. The monthly payout is for life. This is equivalent to receiving $1875 a month.
  • The cash value is 80% of the single premium plus non-guaranteed value. As the cash value is guaranteed at 80% throughout the life of the policy, they can surrender it if they really need the money. Of course, they would have made 20% lost. That is why they cannot have the entire cake of flexibility and eat it all. That being said, they would not make any losses in surrendering the policy after 5 years of receiving the monthly payout because the payout received would have been projected to be 4.5% x 5 = 22.5% of the single premium.
Special Needs Trust

Click to enlarge picture

Better than rental income

By purchasing two of the same policy, their combine monthly payout would be $3750. Actually this is better than renting out a $1,000,000 condominium because:

  1. Rental income is subject to income tax. Hence, the after-tax rental yield is below 4.5%.
  2. The need to manage tenants. If you get a bad tenant, you get nightmare. (I have another client who sold away their investment property after getting into legal lawsuits with the tenant!)
  3. The need to upkeep the properties. The after-cost rental yield is further lowered.
  4. There is no income tax to pay for the passive income receive from the anticipated whole life.

The Advantages

Other reasons why I recommended two of such policies are because:

  1. They still retain ownership over their assets.
  2. They can enjoy the passive income to fund their retirement.
  3. They already own a few properties. Since they do not like stocks, unit trusts and ILPs, they can use such anticipated whole life policy as a means to diversify their risks.
  4. Their entire principal is always refunded upon their death. Hence, there is no need to worry that the assets will be depleted.
  5. The total income of $3750 from the anticipated whole life policy plus the current rental income of $10,000 and the projected CPF Life income of $2500 means that the total monthly passive income is $16,250 which is above the current family expenses.
  6. By making an insurance nomination under s49M to the trust, these two policies are not subject to Letter of Administration (if without a will) and Probate (if there is a will). Hence, the trust will receive the death benefit faster. Since the payout to the trust is faster, it means the trust can start to function and disburse living expenses to the special needs daughter’s guardian or deputy earlier.
  7. The s49M is a revocable nomination. Thus, they retain the rights to change their nomination decisions.
  8. If the $1,000,000 remains as cash or is used to purchase another properties, it will be subject to Letter of Administration and Probate.
  9. Because these two policies are not subject to Probate, they can write their wills in the future without affecting these nomination decisions unless they deliberately revoke these nominations which require a special form to fill up. In other words, it is not possible for them to “accidentally” reverse their earlier decision. Hence, they can be assured that money earmarked for their special needs daughter is safe.
  10. Special Needs Trust Company’s trust is an irrevocable trust. Putting cash into the trust is irreversible. No parents would put $1,000,000 cash into it while still alive. That is why I recommended revocable nomination which will fund the trust only upon the death of the parent (and they still can change their mind on the nomination in the future).

Simple paper work

The most important part of the recommendation is that the transaction is very simple. The purchase of the anticipated whole life policy does not require medical underwriting. It’s just paper work. Special Needs Trust Company’s trust deed is a fixed template which nothing can be change (other than personal particulars and substitute beneficiaries).

Why $1m? Why two policies and not one?

I estimated that his daughter requires at least $1,000,000 in the trust.  Assuming the interest and inflation to be equal and for 50 years time horizon, this money will fund a monthly expense of the special needs daughter equivalent to  $1000000/(50*12) = $1,667.

As to why two policies: In Singapore, life insurance policies are insured under the Policy Owners' Protection Scheme of which the Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation (SDIC) Limited administers the scheme. If the insurer goes bankrupt, the SDIC guarantees the death benefit of up to $500,000 per life assured. That is why I suggest breaking up the policies to park under two different parents.

I am a financial planner, so I need to think of the worst case scenario!

Is this the only way to setup a trust for Special Needs?

No, there are many ways to plan for special needs. This article highlights one of the many ways to do it and the most appropriate manner to plan for special needs depends on the circumstances of each case.

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Case studies, Estate Planning, Retirement Planning Tagged With: hnw

Comments

  1. Kyith says

    22, March 2015 at 7:41 pm

    hi Wilfred great example there. is such a single premium whole life policy available to all or there is a minimum entry premium?

    Reply
    • Wilfred Ling says

      22, March 2015 at 8:41 pm

      Kyith,

      The product is real and normally marketed to ultra high networth individuals.

      However, there is no reason why a normal retail individual cannot buy. Entry premium is $133,350. Its also featured as “Product C” in another case study here: http://www.ifa.sg/case-study-generate-passive-income-retirement-planning/

      Reply
      • Kyith says

        23, March 2015 at 7:34 pm

        hi Wilfred thanks for clarifying. i suppose that not the full 4.5% is guaranteed and perhaps the payout may not keep up with inflation for purchasing power.

        Reply
        • Wilfred Ling says

          23, March 2015 at 10:16 pm

          The purpose of the article is to show case how estate planning can be done and not to demonstrate how good the returns of the whole life product is.

          Taken into the context of the problem that the trust & whole life can solve coupled with knowledge about using the right nomination, the entire estate plan is something which no ordinary person can think of and execute.

          Most people just look at the individual products without looking at their needs. In this example, the needs were established and thus the products are suitable despite it not be the best investment in the world.

          A financial planner looks at the entire situation and construct a holistic plan. A product seller and a product buyer just look at the product in isolation.

          Reply
          • Kyith says

            30, March 2015 at 10:14 pm

            ah i see. thanks for the education wilfred.

  2. Garrett says

    26, March 2015 at 6:24 am

    The single-premium wholelife policy looks like an annuity. Is there a difference? And why not an annuity?

    Reply
    • Wilfred Ling says

      26, March 2015 at 12:28 pm

      The death benefit of an annuity usually decrease over the years.

      Reply

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • Webinar on Major change in cancer treatments in your integrated shield plans 3/9/2022
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 22/7/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 and my recommendations AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 was a product which someone recent...
  • Access Information & Sign Up Page
  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • Should You Buy Insurance From Friends? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbXP_sUiF8M Question: S...
  • CPF: How to Accumulate $1m in your CPF by 57? I read online that there are people who wants to achiev...

Recent comments

  • Sinkie on What Can You Invest If You Have $400k?
  • Sinkie on Why Vanguard Fund Investors Underperformed The Fund Significantly?
  • Sinkie on Why You Always BUY HIGH In Investments?
  • honest_me on Cancer patient ends up with $33,000 bill after insurer refuses to pay for drug & what you must do to avoid this situation
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL
  • susan on Single Premium NTUC Income SAIL

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2023 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty