• All blog entries
    • Calculators
    • Case studies
    • Cost of living
    • CPF Are You Ready?
    • CPF Matters
    • Credit Management
    • e-Learning
    • Estate Planning
    • Events
    • Financial advisers
    • High Networth
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Letters to the Press
    • Magazines
    • Others
    • Retirement Planning
    • Scams
    • Surveys
    • Tragic Stories
    • Unethical sales process
    • Videos
  • Legal
  • Testimonies
    • Individual testimonies
    • Gallery
  • My Account
Hi, looking for a fee-based financial planner in Singapore? Read this article now!
  • Home
  • About
    • About Wilfred Ling
    • Why do you run your own professional financial planning practice?
  • FAQs
    • FAQs on Wilfred Ling’s Financial Services
    • FAQs on Financial Planning
    • FAQs on Investments
    • FAQs on Insurance
    • FAQs on Estate Planning
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Create a financially secure plan for your young family (package details)
    • Retirement Planning
    • Investment Portfolio Management
    • Insurance Planning
  • Fees
  • Cool Tools
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Financial advisers / Why you should not buy products with upfront commission?

Why you should not buy products with upfront commission?

21, March 2010 by Wilfred Ling Leave a Comment

Last Updated on 25, April 2014

Most insurance products pay an upfront commission to the adviser. Sometime it is just one huge lump sum commission other times it is spread over 3 – 6 years. This is to provide the adviser the incentive to sell products but it also promote short-term attitude. I always encounter the following problems as a result of this:

  1. Many advisers after selling the product offer no after-sales service. When the client wants to modify the policy or do fund switching, the adviser “disappears.”
  2. Others would go back to the same client to ask the client to terminate the policy and buy a more “superior” one so as to earn another round of commission. This is called product churning.
  3. When comes to claim, short-term advisers would run away and not response to client’s request to help make claims. Hence, clients have to DIY with the insurers directly to deal with claims. The most common complain from clients who dealt directly with insurers’ claim department is poor customer service. Actually this is usually not the case because the insurer’s staff are technical people and do not necessary possess the soft skills in fronting customers. Moreover, the customer is in emotional distress (that’s why they are claiming the insurance). The most suitable people to help make claims are the advisers themselves because they are trained to handle customers’ objections and more importantly because they already possess the relationship with their clients. However, the lack of compensation to help make claims provide advisers with no incentive to process claims. Processing claim itself cost time and money. It is not a trivial job.
  4. When an adviser resigns, the takeover person does not get compensated for servicing the policy because the commission was already paid upfront to the outgoing adviser. Thus, this is unfair to the new adviser for he isn’t paid and the client’s interest is compromised afterall the client has no way to know when adviser is going to resign.

In the past, there isn’t much policy servicing required because life insurance are usually par products. Even for non-par, the returns are guaranteed anyway. If there is no claim, there is nothing to service. However, in recent times, majority of the life insurance policies that people buy are investment-linked policy. I’ve yet to come across anyone who did not buy ILP (except for me and my wife – we never buy ILPs). Hence, some policy servicing is required such as portfolio rebalancing and identifying funds that have significantly underperformed. Unfortunately, many ILPs pay upfront commissions either in a single lump sum or spread over 3 – 6 years.

Personally I have the privilege of taking over many clients’ ILPs. These ILPs were not sold by me. They are ILPs sold by other advisers in the industry who have either resigned or refuse to talk to their existing policyholders anymore because there is no further commission to earn for servicing.

Sometime I will just try my luck and I’ll asked the insurer how am I going to be compensated if I would to takeover such a policy and can the insurer claw back the commission from the other firm. The answer given to me was: NO. I told them it isn’t fair. But they said this is how the industry works. Yeah, the industry only promote advisers selling products but have no clients' interest at heart. Personally there isn’t much I can do. Perhaps it will be better that clients complain to the insurers about such unfairness. If there is enough complain, I am sure insurers will do something about it such as changing the compensation structure. But in Singapore, majority of Singaporeans cannot even differentiate between investments and savings. I seriously do not think they even know what to complain.

Like this article? Subscribe to my newsletter below for more.

Get regular Tips on Financial Planning. Free subscription for 3 years. Covers all aspect of financial planning such as 'How much salary you should have?', 'How to avoid insurance that is not suitable?", 'What are the retirement planning methods?", etc

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Financial advisers, Insurance, Unethical sales process

What do you think? Leave a comment. Cancel reply


WILFRED LING, CFA

WANT TO GET REGULAR TIPS ON FINANCIAL PLANNING?

JOIN with thousands of other subscribers in getting tips on all aspect of financial planning such as "What is the minimum salary required?", "How avoid insurance that is not suitable", etc.


WILFRED LING IN THE NEWS

Click HERE to find out more.


THE KIND OF CLIENTS I AM LOOKING FOR

NEW TO US?

Learn how you can fully benefit from this massive website: HERE

For Registered Users Only (free)

  • Webinar on 7 Real Stories To Achieve Your Financial Freedom 6/6/2023
  • Webinar on Major change in cancer treatments in your integrated shield plans 3/9/2022
  • How and what to invest now? (Webinar) 28/7/2022
  • How to identify high performing unit trusts in 3 steps (Webinar) 3/9/2021
  • Financial Planning – Christian Perspective Part 2 (Webinar) 14/8/2021

View All

For Clients Only

  • Video Message to Clients 30/12/2021
  • Exclusive client-only Investment Update Webinar by Wilfred 26/11/2021
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Perspective Q2 2020 15/4/2020
  • JPMorgan Guide to Market Q1 2020 5/2/2020

View All

Top Posts

  • Process & Fees Process involved in financial planning   Initial F...
  • Strange way of how CPF Interest is calculated & retirement planning CPF has a rather strange way of calculating interest. I...
  • AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 and my recommendations AIA Pro Achiever 2.0 was a product which someone recent...
  • Psychology behind the Singapore ‘chope’ culture and what we can learn to achieve our financial freedom I was quite amused by the debate on the Singapore ‘chop...
  • Fee-Based Financial Planning in Singapore Are you looking for a fee-based financial planner in Si...

Recent comments

  • mah weng kong on Is PruSelect Vantage plan a good or bad product?
  • Rafi on Wilfred Ling’s Story, the beginning
  • ECE7 on Wilfred Ling’s Story, the beginning
  • Tan Boon Seng on What is meant by pre-existing conditions in real life?
  • Kapil Verma on 70% loss because insurance agent did not provide review for 11 years
  • Ng Ricky on 60’s with no dependants – which insurance is a must have and nice to have?

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

To be notified of new blog post, like this facebook page

Read articles based on different categories

Investment Login

iFAST Central: Login

iFAST Prestige: Login

Navigator: Login

Chartered Financial Analyst

CFA

Chartered Financial Consultant

ChFC

Featured Blogger

IM$avvy

© Copyright 2006-2023 Wilfred Ling

This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore

hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty
hollow-nasty